Regular monitoring of transactions is vital for ensuring effectiveness of the AML procedures. This is possible only if we have an understanding of the normal activity of the client so that it can identify deviations in transactions/ activities.
We shall pay special attention to all complex unusually large transactions/ patterns which appear to have no economic purpose. We may specify internal threshold limits for each class of client accounts and pay special attention to
transactions which exceeds these limits. The background including all documents/ office records/ memorandums/ clarifications sought pertaining to such transactions and purpose thereof shall also be examined carefully and findings shall be recorded in writing. Further such findings, records and related documents shall be made available to auditors and also to SEBI/ stock exchanges/ FIUIND/other relevant Authorities, during audit, inspection or as and when required. These records are required to be maintained and preserved for a period of five years from the date of transaction between the client and VCCL.
We shall ensure a record of the transactions is preserved and maintained in terms of Section 12 of the PMLA and that transaction of a suspicious nature or any other transactions notified under Section 12 of the Act are reported to the Director, FIU-IND. Suspicious transactions shall also be regularly reported to the Principal Officer/ Designated Director.
Further, the compliance cell shall randomly examine a selection of transactions undertaken by clients to comment on their nature i.e. whether they are in the nature of suspicious transactions or not.
All transaction alerts generated by Exchange(s) will be monitored by Principal Officer for necessary action to be taken.
Suspicious Transaction Monitoring and Reporting
We shall ensure that appropriate steps are taken to enable suspicious transactions to be recognized and have appropriate procedures for reporting suspicious transactions. While determining suspicious transactions, we shall be guided by the definition of a suspicious transaction contained in PML Rules as amended from time to time.
A list of circumstances which may be in the nature of suspicious transactions is given below. This list is only illustrative and whether a particular transaction is suspicious or not will depend upon the background, details of the transactions and other facts and circumstances:
- Clients whose identity verification seems difficult or clients that appear not to cooperate
-
Asset management services for clients where the source of the funds is not clear or not in keeping with clients’ apparent standing /business activity;
-
Clients based in high risk jurisdictions;
-
Substantial increases in business without apparent cause;
-
Clients transferring large sums of money to or from overseas locations with instructions for payment in cash Attempted transfer of investment proceeds to apparently unrelated third parties;
-
Unusual transactions by CSCs and businesses undertaken by offshore banks/financial services, businesses reported to be in the nature of export- import of small items.
Any suspicious transaction shall be immediately notified to the Principal Officer. The notification may be done in the form of a detailed report with specific reference to the clients, transactions and the nature/ reason of suspicion. However, it shall be ensured that there is continuity in dealing with the client as normal until told otherwise and the client shall not be told of the report/ suspicion. In exceptional circumstances, consent may not be given to continue to operate the account, and transactions may be suspended, in one or more jurisdictions concerned in the transaction, or other action taken. The Principal Officer and other appropriate compliance, risk management and related staff members shall have timely access to client identification data and CDD information, transaction records and other relevant information.
It is likely that in some cases transactions are abandoned or aborted by clients on being asked to give some details or to provide documents. It is clarified that we shall report all such attempted transactions in STRs, even if not completed by clients, irrespective of the amount of the transaction.
Clause 2.2.4 (g) of this policy categorizes clients of high risk countries, including countries where existence and effectiveness of money laundering controls is suspect or which do not or insufficiently apply FATF standards, as ‘CSC’. Such clients shall also be subject to appropriate counter measures. These measures may include a further enhanced scrutiny of transactions, enhanced relevant reporting mechanisms or systematic reporting of financial transactions, and applying enhanced due diligence while expanding business relationships with the identified country or persons in that country etc.